Measuring Subgroup Variation in Social Judgment Research: A Factorial Survey Approach
نویسندگان
چکیده
Factorial survey research has become increasingly popular in recent years as an efficient and effective methodology for the measurement of social judgments. In addition to the effects of dimensions and levels varied in factorial survey design, researchers often examine the impact of subgroup, or respondent, characteristics. However, the literature on subgroup variations does not reveal systematic differences among subgroups. Not previously examined in factorial survey research, and the focus of the present study, is whether or not subgroup attributes contribute to the variance in social judgments. The results suggest that subgroups, consistent with previous literature, often do not differ in social judgments. Interpretations are offered to account for the findings. r 1998 Academic Press
منابع مشابه
Research Project: The Factorial Survey as a Method for Measuring Attitudes in Population Surveys
The factorial survey is a research method of that combines the advantages of survey research with the advantages of experimental designs. Respondents react to hypothetical descriptions of objects or situations (vignettes) instead of answering single-item questions. By varying each dimension of the vignettes in an experimental design, the dimensions’ impact on respondents’ judgments or decisions...
متن کاملThe Impact of Social Responsibility and Social Intelligence on Auditor's Professional Judgment with the Role of Mediating a Philosophical Mindset
Auditing is a branch of the social sciences and social components that affect the attitude of the auditor and the type of mental attitude of individuals that affects their professional judgment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of mediating the philosophical mindset of auditors on the effects of social responsibility and social intelligence on professional judgment. The sta...
متن کاملThe Role of Mediating the Auditor's Philosophic - Mindedness on the Affects Social Trust and Social Identity on Professional Judgment
The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of mediating the Philosophic - mindedness of auditors on the effects of social trust and social identity on professional judgment. Auditing is a branch of the social sciences and social components that affect the attitude of the auditor and the type of mental attitude of individuals that affects their professional judgment. The statistical p...
متن کاملJudgements of Social Care Professionals on Elder Abuse Referrals: A Factorial Survey
Guidance in the UK requires the co-ordination and standardisation of services to protect adults from abuse. However, there remains considerable ambiguity about the basic concepts of abuse and vulnerability. This paper reports an empirical study of factors in professional decision making in relation to identifying and reporting abuse of older people. A systematic review and a panel of expert pra...
متن کاملThe Relationship between Goal Orientation (Learning, Performance Approach and Performance Avoidance) and Audit Judgment with the Mediator Role of Self-efficacy
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between goal orientation (Learning, Performance approach and Performance avoidance) and audit judgment with the mediator role of self-efficacy. The goal orientation is a personality trait that can be effective in performing tasks. The study is a pre-survey type-applied study. Also, a questionnaire was used to survey the subjects and ...
متن کامل